Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Only a bitch would write such a thing.

A successful man is one who makes more money than his wife can spend. A successful woman is one who can find such a man.

Zimmerman

I notice that there are many people posting on this forum (and many other forums) who were originally calling the police department racist and inept. They wrote that the police let Zimmerman walk because Martin was black. As it turned out they recommended that he be charged the same night that Martin was killed. The prosecutor did not charge Zimmerman because they did not have a case yet. It took the best prosecutor in the land, with unlimited resources, many days to do what you all wanted done in a single night.
.
The Sanford Police did a fabulous did a fabulous job at investigating a difficult case. When it comes to the police, people like to throw punches, but they do not like to give credit where credit is due. America owes the Sanford Police Department, and specifically the chief of police, a big apology. The people who were truly being racist (other than Zimmerman maybe), as usual were the ones lying and calling everyone a racist.

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Chronicle... racist comments

AnAubis wrote:
"Yelp, a white traitor is fully acceptable to another traitor that is Jack. This type of thinking will cause this country to disintergrate as a reult of internal enemies traitors. Say what you will about Black Americans but you can't say that they are traitors like this guy."
.
.
AnAubis wrote:
"Jack you are a foolish traitor so I could care less about what you think about me, what I think and what I say. Got that traitor? Nothing racist about pointing out two white traitors to the U. S. The oath is to defend the constitution against foreign and domestic enemies. Don't get caught on the wrong side of this. You will be surprised that most Americans support the country and not white privilege."

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Black on White Crime

Black on white crime... horrific rape of couple crime.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaxB-ynCgsc

Sunday, March 18, 2012

mary jane

http://www.chron.com/news/article/New-wrinkle-in-pot-debate-stoned-driving-3416134.php

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Abortion of NewBorns

http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03/01/medethics-2011-100411.full

Monday, March 5, 2012

anti-white attacks

http://www.kmbc.com/r/30572405/detail.html

Friday, February 17, 2012

Texas teacher tells Hispanic student to “Go back to Mexico”

A Texas teacher is fighting to keep her job after allegedly telling a Hispanic student to “go back to Mexico,” according to a Fox 4 News story.

Two-time “Teacher of the Year” Shirley Burns, 63, was handing out Title 1 forms to her 8th grade class at Barnett Junior High School in Arlington, the television station reported. A disruptive student requested a Spanish version of the form, saying, “I’m Mexican. I’m Mexican.”

Burns told the student that he could get a Spanish version in the main office, but the student continued to repeat, “I’m Mexican,” according to the television station.

Bunn responded, “[Then] go back to Mexico,” according to Fox 4.

“It was almost instantaneous. I thought, ‘God, I don’t believe that came out of my mouth,’” she told The Fort Worth Star-Telegram. “It was a very, very hard week, the end of six weeks. It was late in the day. It was a Friday. We were on the third day of the first curriculum assessment and I knew it wasn’t going well. It was just an extremely bad day.”

Bunn has been placed on administrative leave as the Arlington School District is reviewing the case. An examiner has recommended that the school board allow Bunn to return to her job.

The school board could reject the examiner’s recommendation and fire Bunn.

==================================================

I will now predict this "Mexican" child's future:
In twenty years time, this man-child will be complaining about the economic gap between Hispanics and whites. The guy will wonder why income disparities exist. He will ignore the fact that, in general, Asians also earn more than Hispanics. He will eventually blame his hard life on "institutional racism" and "white privilege", then continue teaching his children to speak Spanish rather than English. He will become very angry that his children do not have the same opportunities as white children, and the cycle will continue.
I swear to God... I am so clairvoyant.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Sepration of Church and State

Do you pro-"prayer in public school" people really know what you are asking for? Those public school teachers would start pushing some crazy Unitarian religion on our children. No thanks. I will teach my children about God myself.
There is already enough crazy propaganda in the public school system. I will never forget the time in 6th grade when I read some reading material that my "science" teacher put out for us. One of the magazines had an article about how the evil United States government created AIDS to kill black people. Do you really want these people teaching your children to pray? I did not think so.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Baby Killers

"Fetus" is a medical term. There is no such thing as a "baby" in medical terms. There is "Fetus, Newborn, Infant, Toddler, ect..", but no baby. "Baby" is a laymen term that encompasses "fetus, newborn, and infant". Saying it is okay to kill a fetus is like saying it is okay to kill an adolescent but not a teenager. Quit trying to change the English language in order to make yourself feel better about killing babies. Thank you for your cooperation.
.
"Baby:
1. an infant or very young child.
2. a newborn or very young animal.
3. the youngest member of a family, group, etc.
4. an immature or childish person.
5. a human fetus."
.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/baby

Friday, January 27, 2012

Bar stool economics

Bar Stool Economics:
Well this explains it all!!! Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all Ten comes to $100.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this: The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1. The sixth would pay $3. The seventh would pay $7. The eighth would pay $12. The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.
'Since you are all such good customers, he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.
But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so: The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings). The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings). The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings). The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings). The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings). The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings). Each of the six was better off than before And the first four continued to drink for free.
But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
'I only got a dollar out of the $20', declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!' 'Yeah, that's right', exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar, too.
It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!
'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two?
The wealthy get all the breaks!'
Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him.
But when it came time to pay the bill they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works.
The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction.
Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.
In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Georgia
For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.